Friday, September 10th, 2010

 

 


   
Letters to the Editor:
Back

Ready for rumble strips

Dear Editor:
This summer I had the opportunity to travel over four provinces and seeing the work that has been done through the government road incentive.
It’s quite a change from a few years ago and the patching job that was done then. As you drive in Ontario with its rocks and lakes you have to look at the cost of road construction to even have a good two lane with increasing passing lanes being added. As I drove over many miles of the Trans Canada Hwy in other provinces I was taken by the miles of straight road where one could look back for miles in the mirror and ahead for miles and wonder does this road ever end.
I was surprised to see our Ontario Government has come to the conclusion that rumble strips might be a positive in preventing road accidents. I was ready when I got home to send them a message about them and lo and behold I read it in the paper. I watched them placing the rumble strips on the pavement in other provinces. To me it was no harder than marking the yellow strips that are laid down. A simple machine that leaves imprints in the pavement as it moves along. It sure lets you know when you drive over it, that you are out of bounds. A noise that brings you back to reality if you cut a corner too wide, if you let yourself be lulled after endless miles. So I hope to see many miles in Northern Ontario use this devise.
I was somewhat taken back to see a fatality on the newly construction on Highway 69. It just goes to show that accidents happen on the best of roads whether it be fatigue, medical, speeding or lack of keeping your mind on your driving or road conditions. One thing that really bothers me though, is the miles of worn out highways that we Northerners have to drive on, in the populated areas we live in, as we travel to and from our towns in our daily life.
It seems like our local driving doesn’t matter and to get the last mile before replacing is their object. We are instead pushed to buy new vehicles to replace those worn out by poor roads to keep our southern neighbours happily employed. I may be out to lunch but that’s the way I see it
Douglas Edwards
Englehart



Untitled Document

I embrace STATO

Dear Editor:
I have been reading with great interest each letter regarding the STATO trail.
I now feel it is time to put my words to paper in regards to this subject.
I am finding it so very typical the “criticism to change” that always seems to happen when something “new” occurs in this City.
We are such skeptics when it comes to change!
Why can’t we just wait until the trail is completed and in full use before we start criticizing?
Oh, I can hear all of you now as you read the line above, “What is she wanting?” “Someone to get hurt or killed!”
If you feel that way then why haven’t there been injuries or deaths of pedestrians along the highway between Haileybury and New Liskeard in past years?
As we all know there have always been bikers, joggers and walkers along this highway over the years. So, what did we the driver do then? We slowed down and veered slightly to avoid that pedestrian. Right?
So now my question to you is, “Why was this pedestrian using the paved portion of the highway and not the shoulder?”
I can answer this question for you!
So many of you know I used to walk along the highway a lot. I knew it was risky but it was far easier to walk along the pavement instead of the gravel shoulders. I’m sure this is true for bikers and joggers as well. There is far better traction on pavement than loose gravel. Maybe that young biker Mr. Dawson saw caught a bike wheel in the gravel! Who knows?
I personally can not wait to get back to walking and having a paved trail I can walk on -- the shoulder.
Those of you who have criticized this trail tend to forget there is a lot now to getting this trail established then handing the plans to our City Council for approval.
Not only must it pass City Council approval it must be approved by the Province of Ontario. It must meet all provincial rules and regulations. The traffic flow, where the trail is being constructed and width of this trail are all scrutinized before anything is built! So once again “Why the criticism?”
As we all can see this trail will be along the highway in most part. So, we as drivers must drive cautiously knowing there will be users out on the STATO trail.
It is not the 401 so obey the ‘Speed Limit” and obey the “Watch for Pedestrian”signs.
In other word SLOW DOWN. There has never been a pedestrian hurt or killed on this stretch of highway. So let’s keep it that way.
As far as the inconvenience of parking for the Lakeshore residents. I’m sorry to say you will have to be like the rest of the City of Temiskaming Shores residents and use a driveway. I don’t know why it was ever allowed in the first place that you were allowed to have this “Luxury “ parking but your days are almost over and you will have to find alternative choices. Sorry!
I know, another “change for you to criticize!”
I personally commend the STATO Committee and I thank them for their hard work over these past few years. They took the incentive to take on a project this size and persevere through the criticism to see this project to its completion in the near future.
I for one embrace the change.
THANK YOU STATO COMMITTEE.
Sincerely
Gail St. Louis
Haileybury

 






Web Poll


What should be the priority of the next municipal council?